While trusts can be a valuable tool for estate planning and asset protection, there are also some potential disadvantages that you should consider before deciding whether a trust is right for you.
Understanding Trusts: A Brief Overview
A trust is a legal arrangement where one person, the grantor, transfers assets to another person, the trustee, to hold and manage for the benefit of a third person, the beneficiary. The trustee is responsible for administering the trust according to the terms set out in the trust document, which is known as the trust agreement.
Trusts can be revocable or irrevocable:
- Revocable trusts allow the grantor to retain control over the assets and change the terms of the trust at any time.
- Irrevocable trusts give up control of the assets to the trustee, and the terms of the trust cannot be changed without the consent of the beneficiaries.
Common types of trusts:
- Living trusts are created while the grantor is still alive and can be used to avoid probate and manage assets during the grantor’s lifetime.
- Testamentary trusts are created in a will and take effect after the grantor’s death.
Disadvantages of a Trust: A Deeper Dive
-
Complexity: Trusts can be complex legal documents that are difficult to understand for those unfamiliar with estate law. The language used in trust agreements can be technical and may require the assistance of an attorney to interpret.
-
Costs: Setting up and maintaining a trust can be expensive. You will likely need to pay attorney fees, trustee fees, and other administrative costs. These costs can vary depending on the complexity of the trust and the size of your estate.
-
Loss of Control: Once you transfer assets to an irrevocable trust, you give up control over those assets. You will no longer be able to sell, gift, or use the assets in any way. This can be a disadvantage if you need access to the assets in the future.
-
Recordkeeping: Trusts require meticulous recordkeeping. You will need to keep track of all assets that are held in the trust, as well as any income or expenses related to those assets. This can be a time-consuming and tedious task.
-
No Protection from Creditors: Trusts do not offer complete protection from creditors. If you have outstanding debts, your creditors may be able to make a claim against the assets in the trust.
-
Tax Implications: There are potential tax implications associated with trusts. Depending on the type of trust and the assets it holds, you may be liable for income taxes, capital gains taxes, or estate taxes.
-
Limited Flexibility: Trusts can be inflexible instruments. Once the terms of the trust are set, they can be difficult to change. This can be a disadvantage if your circumstances change and you need to make adjustments to the trust.
-
Potential for Disputes: Disputes can arise over the interpretation of the trust agreement or the actions of the trustee. This can lead to costly and time-consuming litigation.
-
Privacy Concerns: Trusts are public records, which means that the terms of the trust and the identity of the beneficiaries are accessible to the public. This can be a concern for individuals who value their privacy.
Weighing the Pros and Cons: Is a Trust Right for You?
While trusts have some potential disadvantages, they can also offer significant benefits.
Benefits of a Trust:
- Avoid probate: Trusts can avoid the probate process, which can save time and money.
- Asset protection: Trusts can protect your assets from creditors and lawsuits.
- Privacy: Trusts can keep your financial affairs private.
- Control: You can specify how your assets will be distributed after your death.
- Tax benefits: Depending on the type of trust, you may be able to reduce your tax liability.
The decision of whether or not to create a trust is a personal one. You should carefully consider the pros and cons and consult with an attorney to determine if a trust is right for you.
Frequently Asked Questions About Trusts
What are the best assets to put in a trust?
The best assets to put in a trust will vary depending on your individual circumstances. However, some common assets that are often placed in trusts include:
- Bank accounts
- Real estate
- Insurance policies
- Financial investments
- Personal property
- Limited liability companies
- Cryptocurrency
What can I put in a trust for my child?
You can put a variety of assets in a trust for your child, including:
- Cash
- Stocks
- Bonds
- Mutual funds
- Real estate
- Personal property
The purpose of the trust will determine what assets you should put into it. For example, if you want to provide for your child’s education, you could put money into a trust that is specifically designed for that purpose.
What assets should not be in a trust?
There are some assets that you should not put in a trust, such as:
- Retirement accounts
- Health Savings Accounts
- Vehicles
- Cash
The tax implications of these assets can make them unsuitable for inclusion in a trust.
Is a trust worth the money?
The cost of setting up and maintaining a trust can vary depending on the complexity of the trust and the size of your estate. However, the potential benefits of a trust, such as avoiding probate and protecting your assets, can outweigh the costs.
Trusts can be a valuable tool for estate planning and asset protection. However, it is important to understand the potential disadvantages of trusts before making a decision. You should carefully consider the pros and cons and consult with an attorney to determine if a trust is right for you.
Trust Disadvantages and Solutions
The main drawbacks of trusts are their perceived irrevocability, the loss of control over the assets placed in trust, and their associated costs.
It is true that trusts can be made revocable, but doing so usually has detrimental effects on stamp duty, estate duty, tax, and asset protection. Revocability is something to talk about when the trust’s terms are taken into account.
For fear of giving up control, many would-be settlors are hesitant to transfer assets to trustees. If the trust is to remain valid or useful for its intended purpose, careful planning and an understanding of the basic legal requirements of a trust are necessary for those who wish to maintain effective control over the trust assets after the transfer.
A settlor runs the risk of the trust failing and them continuing to be recognized as the legitimate owners if they exercise excessive control over the trust. All of the benefits of having the assets held in trust could be lost if this occurs. To provide comfort to a settlor, different levels of control and information rights can be maintained. These include:
01 Memorandum of Wishes – In the context of a discretionary trust, it is customary for the settlor to inform the trustees of their intentions regarding the assets if they had continued to be the owners. When handling the trust property, the trustees will refer to the detailed written memorandum they have created outlining their wishes. The trustees will not be bound by the settlor’s wishes, but in reality, they would be hesitant to depart from them unless a change in circumstances or other issues would make acting differently obviously detrimental to the beneficiaries. 02 Protector: The trust property may be subject to some degree of control by an appointed “protector.” Although the settlor’s trusted friend, family member, or professional adviser is typically named, using the services of a reputable trust company is also becoming more and more common. If we are not asked to act as trustees, Sovereign can act as a professional guardian. We believe that giving a protector authority beyond the ability to veto trustee decisions or actions would be foolish. A protector who has the authority to actively manage the trustees may be considered a “quasi-trustee,” which could be detrimental to the trust. 03 Two-tier company and trust structure: When the underlying assets are owned by a company that is subsequently owned by a trust, there is occasionally more flexibility available. The settlor or a settlor-appointed person may serve as the company’s director, allowing them to oversee the underlying assets on a day-to-day basis with little difficulty or requirement to consult the trustees. In some situations, this two-tier structure can be beneficial, but if the company’s director lives in a nation with high taxation, there may be tax and other drawbacks. 04 Joint trustees – A trust may be set up with joint trustees so that any action requires both of their consent. The second trustee may be the settlor or a business that the settlor owns or controls. Once more, in the event that the settlor resides in a nation with a high tax rate, there might be negative taxation or another consequence. As an alternative, having two distinct professional trust corporations serve as joint trustees can provide a “check and balance.” Although this can be costly and time-consuming, some trusts might find it appropriate. 05 Private Trust Companies – A Private Trust Company (PTC) is a business established expressly to serve as trustee for one or more linked trusts. Family members may take part in the PTC’s management and, consequently, in the decisions that the PTC must make in its capacity as trustee, including those concerning the direction and management of the trustee’s owned businesses.
A third-party professional trust company might not be able to provide the settlor with the level of flexibility and quick response time that they need, and they won’t have the same level of familiarity with the operations of the trust’s companies as the family members do. A PTC structure can circumvent these issues. Decisions can be made by directors who are acquainted with the company; if a change in direction is needed for the trust’s management, the PTC board can be replaced. Therefore, a PTC can give the settlor more confidence that their goals in setting up the trust will be achieved.
To give the PTC more substance and legitimacy and to make sure that the PTC and the trust(s) it oversees are operated properly, it is customary and advised to have at least one director who is an expert in trusts. The interests of the trust’s beneficiaries as a whole must guide all decisions made by the PTC’s directors.
The ultimate ownership of the PTC will be more significant than the board’s charter because it will enable the owners to remove and replace directors as needed. Nonetheless, if the settlor is operating as the PTC’s sole or majority shareholder, or as the guarantor member, they will continue to have a sizable amount of control. Therefore, in order to achieve the goals of settling the trust, careful evaluation of the PTC, family structure, and overall trust is required.
Many jurisdictions specifically exempt PTCs from licensing and regulation requirements, provided that the PTC serves exclusively as trustee of a particular trust or group of trusts and refrains from soliciting from or doing business with the public on behalf of trust companies. Additionally, most of the time, neither the PTC nor the trusts it works with have any statutory bodies that require reports or accounts from them.
In general, the expenses associated with creating a PTC and a trust (or trusts) will be greater than the expenses associated with creating a trust alone. Nonetheless, the recurring expenses might be lower than the trustee fees that a separate, outside trustee would demand. This is especially true for large trust assets, as independent trustees frequently demand fees based on a portion of the assets.
A common misconception is that maintaining a trust would be extremely expensive. It is true that a large number of big banks and other financial institutions charge hefty setup fees for trusts. In addition, they charge annual administration fees equal to a portion of the trust’s assets as well as basis points for the cash investments made by the underlying trust.
Trusts are affordable, even for relatively modest estates, thanks to the generally more reasonable fees charged by independent trust companies. Independent trust companies, as experts, provide a more customized strategy that will enable settlors and beneficiaries to accomplish their goals. Additionally, it means that they are free to choose the best investments for the trust and can be consulted on technical issues without feeling compelled to use in-house investment advisers in order to obtain covert compensation. To know more Contact Us.
“*” indicates required fields Name